The Pumkin Hour in Science

How and Why Major Achievements Turn into Marginal Findings

Authors

  • Armen Petrosyan AcuSmart, Scientific and Educational Web Portal, Editor

Keywords:

Contribution, Appraisal, Relevancy, Recognition, Atomic Weight

Abstract

By scrutinizing Theodore Richards’ thirty years career success almost entirely due to the determination of the atomic weights, the author casts light on a very important phenomenon in science that slips the minds of philosophers and scientists up to now. The Pumpkin Hour comes when an all-embracing transformation of the conceptual background of a subject field that brings to a revision of its basic tenets turns the fine carriage of some - not only theoretical but even experimental - results raised to the rank of outstanding contribution into a pumpkin of minor improvements with no crucial role in knowledge. The paper shows the mechanism governing the reappraisal of “pieces” of knowledge and reveals the link preventing the scientific community from proper assessment of new ideas and facts: a discovery is valued the higher the more the value it adds (by consolidating, unfolding, and supporting) to the conceptual background through the lens of which it itself is looked at.

References

Aston, F. W. (1948). Mass Spectra and Isotopes. London: Edward Arnold.

Berry, A. J. (1946). Modern Chemistry: Some Sketches of Its Historical Developments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Berzelius, J. (1827). Jahres-Bericht über die Fortschritte der physischen Wissenschaften. Tubingen: Heinrich Laupp.

Briscoe, H. T. (1935). The Structure and Properties of Matter. New York; London: McGraw-Hill.

Cannizzaro, S. (1910). Sketch of a Course of Chemical Philosophy. Edinburgh: The Alembic Club.

Castelfranchi, G. (1932). Recent Advances in Atomic Physics. Vol. I: Atoms, Molecules and Electrons. London: Churchill, 1932.

Clarke, F. W. (1882). A Recalculation of the Atomic Weights. Washington: Smithsonian Institution.

Crookes, W. (1886). Opening Address by President of the Section // Nature. Vol. 34. N 879. P. 423 – 432.

De Laeter, J. R. (2009). The Role of Mass Spectrometry in Atomic Weight Determinations // Mass Spectrometry Review. Vol. 28. N 1. P. 2 – 19ю

De Laeter, J. R., Bölke, J. K., De Bievre, P., Hidaka, H., Peiser, H. S., Rosman, K. J. R., Taylor, P. D. P. (2003). Atomic Weights of the Elements: Review 2000 // Pure and Applied Chemistry. Vol. 75. N 6. P. 683 – 800.

Duhem, P. (1906). La théorie physique: Son objet et sa structure. Paris: Chevalier & Riviére.

Dumas, J.-B. (1859). Mémoire sur les équivalents des corps simples. Paris: Mallet – Bacheller.

Ede A. (2006). The Chemical Element: A Historical Perspective. Westport (CT); London: Greenwood Press.

Findlay, A. (1948). A Hundred Years of Chemistry. L.: Gerald Duckworth.

Galissard de Marignac, J. Ch. (1891). Oeuvres complètes. T. I. Genève: Société générale d’imprimerie.

Gay, H. (1997). The Chemical Philosophy of Theodore W. Richards // Ambix. Vol. 44. N 1. P. 19 – 38.

Gladstone, J. H. (1884). Presidential address before the Chemical Section of the British Association // Report of fifty-third meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. London: John Murray. P. 448 - 454.

Hanson, N. R. (2018). Perception and Discovery: An introduction to Scientific Inquiry. Cham (Switzerland): Springer Nature.

Harrow, B. (1920). Eminent Chemists of Our Time. New York: D. van Nostrand.

Herschbach, D. R. (2014). Theodore William Richards: Apostle of Atomic Weights and Nobel Prize Winner 1914 // Angewandte Chemie: International Edition. Vol. 53. P. 13982 – 13987.

Hönigschmid, O., Horovitz, S. (1915). Über das Atomgewicht des “Uranbleis” // Monatshefte für Chemie. Vol. 36. N 5. S. 355 – 380.

Jones, H. C. (1913). A New Era in Chemistry: Some of the More Important Developments in General Chemistry during the Last Quarter of a Century. New York: D. van Nostrand.

Kuhn, Th. S. (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The Chicago University Press.

Lakatos, I. (1989). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philsoophical Pappers. Vol. I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lowry, T. M. (1915). Historical introduction to chemistry. London: Macmillan.

Mallet, J. W. (1880). Revision of the Atomic Weight of Aluminum // Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 1880. Vol. 171. P. 1003 – 1035.

Mendeléeff, D. I. (1958). Periodicheskiy zakon [The Periodic Law]. Moscow: The Academy of Sciences’ Publishing House. (In Russ.).

Merton, Th. (1915). On the spectra of ordinary lead and lead of radioactive origin // Proceedings of the Royal Society. A: Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences. Vol. 91. N 627. P. 198 – 201.

Meyer, E. von. (1906). A History of Chemistry from Earliest Times to the Present Day: An Introduction to the Study of the Science. L.: Macmillan.

Moseley, H. G. J. (1913). The High-frequency Spectra of the Elements // Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. Vol. 26. N 156. P. 1024 – 1034.

Nasini, R. (1895). Osservazioni sopra l’argo // Gazzetta chimica Italiana. Vol. 25. N II. P. 37 – 46.

Petrosyan, A. E. (2015). Within a Nutshell (The Mental Roots of Human Insusceptibility to New Ideas) // Journal of the Knowledge Economy. Vol. 6. N 1. P. 157 – 189.

Petrosyan, A. E. (2016). A Straightjacket for Conceptual Breakthroughs (The Appraisal in Science as a Brake on the Progress of Knowledge). II. What to Do to Get Out of the Impasse of Neophobia // International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. Vol. 2. N 4. P. 28 - 67.

Prout W. (1815). On the Relation between the Specific Gravities of Bodies in their Gaseous State and the Weights of their Atoms // Annals of Philosophy. Vol. VI. November. P. 321 – 330.

Quine, W. v. O. (1961). From a Logical Point of View: 9 Logico-philosophical Essays. New York etc.: Harper Torchbooks.

Rayleigh, Lord, Ramsay, W. (1895). Argon, a New Constituent of the Atmosphere // Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. Series A. Vol. 186. Part I. P. 187 – 241.

Richards Th. W. (1911). The Fundamental Properties of the Elements // Science. Vol. XXXIV. N 878. P. 537 – 550.

Richards Th. W. (1919). The Problem of Radioactive Lead // Science. 1919. Vol. XLIX. N 1253. P. 1 - 11.

Richards Th. W., Lembert M. E. (1914). The Atomic Weight of Lead of Radioactive Origin // Journal of American Chemical Society. Vol. 36. N 7. P. 1329 – 1344.

Richards, Th. W., Wadsworth, Ch. (1916). Further Study of the Atomic Weight of Lead of Radioactive Origin // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. Vol. 2. N 12. P. 694 – 700.

Soddy, F. (1920). Science and Life: Aberdeen Addresses. London: John Murray.

Soddy, F. (1922). The Interpretation of Radium, and the Structure of the Atom. New York: G P. Putnam’s Sons.

Soddy, F. (1932). The Interpretation of the Atom, London: John Murray.

Soddy, F., Hyman. H. (1914). The atomic weight of lead from ceylon thorite // Journal of the Chemical Society, Transactions. Vol. 105. Part II. P. 1402 – 1408.

Stas, J-S. (1894). Oeuvres complètes. T. I. Bruxelles: C. Muquardt.

The Nobel Prize: The First Hundred Years (2001). Ed. by Levinovitz E. W., Ringertz N. London: Imperial College Press.

Strutt, R. J. (1901). On the Tendency of the Atomic Weights to Approximate to Whole Numbers // Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. Vol. I. Sixth Series. January – June. P. 311 – 314.

Thomson, J. J. (1907). The Corpuscular Theory of Matter. London: Archibald Constable.

Thomson, J. J. (1914). Atomic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Thomson, Th. (1825). An Attempt to Establish the First Principles of Chemistry by Experiment. Vol. I. London: Baldwin, Cradock, and Joy.

Downloads

Published

28-12-2022

How to Cite

Petrosyan, A. (2022). The Pumkin Hour in Science: How and Why Major Achievements Turn into Marginal Findings. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 18(2), 413–444. Retrieved from https://www.cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/1058