The Indifference of Objectivity to Difference and Identity

The Paradox of Subject-Object Obfuscation Between Schelling and Deleuze

Authors

  • Rafael Holmberg University College London

Keywords:

Schelling, Deleuze, Paradox, Identity, Difference, Objectivity, Act

Abstract

Schelling and Deleuze are polarised respectively as philosopher of identity and philosopher of difference par excellence. Schelling grounds reason in his early Naturphilosophie in the a priori identity deduced from the abstraction of the proposition A=A. Deleuze, however, reworks the Platonic Idea and Nietzsche’s Eternal Return in the service of an a priori ‘problematic being’, an ontological difference-in-itself, which precedes metaphysical identity. Despite their apparently polarised metaphysical groundwork, they stumble across a similar consequence: the distinction between subject and object, and any problematic derived thereof, is in consequence of the ontological constitution of the object itself. The paradox of objectivity as indifference to an a priori difference or identity is presented, and preliminarily suggested to be due to the Deleuze-Schelling opposition not being a difference-identity opposition, but an opposition between difference and a ‘blind act’ which retroactively precedes the making-identical to itself of the one as distinguished from the many.

Downloads

Published

28-12-2022

How to Cite

Holmberg, R. (2022). The Indifference of Objectivity to Difference and Identity: The Paradox of Subject-Object Obfuscation Between Schelling and Deleuze. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 18(2), 112–128. Retrieved from https://www.cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/1059