Aesthetic Ideology in the Anthropocene

On the Total Mobilization of the Earth into the Status of a Work of Art

Authors

  • Daniel Andersson Linköping University

Keywords:

aestheticization of politics, anthropocene, modern technology, political myth, total mobilization, will to power

Abstract

In light of the radical change to the reach and range of technical alteration, the co-evolution of mankind and the biosphere has become one of the principal questions of our age. As we find that man has altered the planet at just about every scale we are capable of measuring, the question concerning the essence of technology, in its power to not only imitate but in many ways even surpass the forces of nature, has become critical for the discussion about global environmental change. Often, the empirical findings of the geosciences have been interpreted as a motive to question the long-standing dualism between nature and artifice that itself has served, during almost the entirety of the history of Western philosophy, as the productive tension through which concepts such as technology and history have hitherto been conceptualized. But if much of our contemporary discourse on global environmental change is premised upon the functional and formal similarities between natural and artificial organs, I argue that returning to the intellectual current of 1920s and 30s Weimar Culture, where the relationship between globalization and industrialization first became of central hermeneutic concern, may shed new light on the Anthropocene as the conceptual site for a resurged geoaesthetics that denotes the ontological ubiquity of the designed environment, making the technological the foundation for a modern typological cosmology. Examining Ernst Jünger’s early work on the meaning of the planetary impact of modern technology, I caution that by reifying the cybernetic disclosure of the earth as a natural-artificial hybrid into a naturalistic ontology of work, we are liable to render our planet perfectly functional to its sustained instrumental appropriation as standing-reserve.

References

Bambach, Charles, Heidegger’s Roots: Nietzsche, National Socialism, and the Greeks, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 2003.

Barnosky, Anthony D., Hadly, Elizabeth A., Bascompte, Jordi, Berlow, Eric L. et al., “Approaching a State Shift in Earth’s Biosphere,” Nature, Vol. 486, 2012.

Baskin, Jeremy, “Paradigm Dressed as Epoch: The Ideology of the Anthropocene,” Environmental Values, Vol. 24, 2015.

Benjamin, Walter, “Theories of German Fascism: On the Collection of Essays War and Warrior, Edited by Ernst Jünger,” New German Critique, Vol. 17, 1979.

Benjamin, Walter, “The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility,” in Selected Writings Vol. 3, 1935-1938, ed. H. Eiland & M. W. Jennings, and trans. E. Jephcott et al., Cambridge, Harvard University, 2002.

Blok, Vincent, Ernst Jünger’s Philosophy of Technology: Heidegger and the Poetics of the Anthropocene, London, Routledge, 2017.

Cassirer, Ernst, The Myth of the State, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1946.

Cassier, Ernst, “Form and Technology,” in A. S. Hoel and I. Folkvord, Ernst Cassirer on Form and Technology: Contemporary Readings, London, Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.

Cera, Agostino, “The Technocene or Technology as (Neo)Environment,” Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, Vol. 21, No. 2-3, 2017.

Chakrabarty, Dipesh, “The Climate of History: Four Theses,” Critical Inquiry, Vol. 35, No. 2, 2009.

Clark, Nigel, Inhuman Nature: Sociable Life on a Dynamic Planet, London, Sage, 2011.

Cooper, Melinda, Life as Surplus: Biotechnology and Capitalism in the Neoliberal Era, Seattle, University of Washington Press, 2008.

Costea, Bogdan & Amiridis, Kostas, “Ernst Jünger, Total Mobilization, and the Work of War,” Organization, Vol. 24, No. 4, 2017.

Crutzen, Paul J., “Geology of Mankind,” Nature, Vol. 415, 2002.

Crutzen, Paul J. & Stoermer, Eugene F. (2000). “The ‘Anthropocene,’” IGBP Global Change Newsletter, Vol. 41, 2000.

Cunha, Daniel, “The Anthropocene as Fetishism,” Mediations: Journal of the Marxist Literary Group, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2015.

Davis, Bret W., Heidegger and the Will: On the Way to Gelassenheit, Evanston, Northwestern University Press, 2007.

Donges, Jonathan F., Lucht, Wolfgang & Müller-Hansen, Finn, “The Technosphere in Earth System Analysis: A Coevolutionary Perspective,” The Anthropocene Review, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2017.

Ellis, Erle C., “The Planet of No Return,” in M. Schellenberger & T. Nordhaus (eds.), Love Your Monsters: Postenvironmentalism and the Anthropocene, Oakland, The Breakthrough Institute, 2011.

Ellis, Erle C., “Ecology in an Anthropogenic Biosphere,” Ecological Monographs, Vol. 85, No. 3, 2015.

Ellis, Erle C. & Haff, Peter K., “Earth Science in the Anthropocene: New Epoch, New Paradigm, New Responsibilities,” EOS Transactions, Vol. 90, 2009.

Ellis, Erle C. & Ramankutty, Navin, “Putting People in the Map: Anthropogenic Biomes of the World,” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, Vol. 6, 2008.

Gelderloos, Carl, Biological Modernism: The New Human in Weimar Culture, Evanston, Northwestern University Press, 2019.

Gordon, Peter E., Continental Divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 2010.

Haff, Peter K., “Technology and Human Purpose: The Problem of Solids Transport on the Earth’s Surface,” Earth System Dynamics, Vol. 3, 2012.

Haff, Peter K., “Technology as a Geological Phenomenon: Implications for Human Well-Being,” Geological Society Special Publication, Vol. 395, No. 1, 2013.

Haff, Peter K., “Humans and Technology in the Anthropocene: Six Rules,” The Anthropocene Review, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2014.

Hamilton, Clive, Defiant Earth: The Fate of Humans in the Anthropocene, Cambridge, Polity Press, 2017.

Hamilton, Clive, Bonneuil, Christophe & Gemenne, François, “Thinking the Anthropocene,” in C. Hamilton, C. Bonneuil & F. Gemenne (eds.), The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis: Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoch, London, Routledge, 2015.

Hamilton, Clive & Grinevald, Jacques, “Was the Anthropocene Anticipated?,” The Anthropocene Review, Vol 2, No. 1, 2015.

Haraway, Donna, “Cyborgs and Symbionts: Living Together in the New World Order,” in C. H. Gray, H. J. Figueroa-Sarriera, and S. Mentor (eds.), The Cyborg Handbook, London, Routledge, 1995.

Heidegger, Martin, “The Age of the World Picture,” in The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, trans. W. Lovitt, New York, Harper & Row, 1977.

Heidegger, Martin, “The Question Concerning Technology,” in The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, trans. W. Lovitt, New York, Harper & Row, 1977

Heidegger, Martin, “The Will to Power as Knowledge and as Metaphysics,” in Nietzsche, Vol. 3 & 4: The Will to Power as Knowledge and as Metaphysics; Nihilism, ed. & trans. D. Farrell Krell, trans. J. Stambaugh & F. A. Capuzzi, New York, Harper & Row, 1987.

Herf, Jeffrey C., Reactionary Modernism: Technology, Culture, and Politics in Weimar and the Third Reich, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1984.

Herrmann-Pillath, Carsten, “Energy, Growth, and Evolution: Towards a Naturalistic Ontology of Economics,” Ecological Economics, Vol. 119, 2015.

Hillach, Ansgar, “The Aesthetics of Politics: Walter Benjamin’s ‘Theories of German Fascism,’” New German Critique, Vol. 17, 1979.

Hoły-Łuczaj, Magdalena & Blok, Vincent, “How to Deal with Hybrids in the Anthropocene: Towards a Philosophy of Technology and Environmental Philosophy 2.0,” Environmental Values, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2019.

Hornborg, Alf, “Post-Capitalist Ecologies: Energy, ‘Value,’ and Fetishism in the Anthropocene,” Capitalism Nature Socialism, Vol. 24, No. 7, 2016.

Hornborg, Alf, “Artifacts Have Social Consequences, Not Agency: Toward A Critical Theory of Global Environmental History,” European Journal of Social Theory, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2017.

Hornborg, Alf, Nature, Society, and Justice in the Anthropocene: Unraveling the Money-Energy-Technology Complex, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2019.

Hui, Yuk, “For a Planetary Thinking,” e-flux, Vol. 114, 2020.

Ihde, Don, Heidegger’s Technologies: Postphenomenological Perspectives, New York, Fordham University Press, 2010.

Jameson, Fredric, The Seeds of Time, New York, Columbia University Press, 1996.

Jay, Martin, “‘The Aesthetic Ideology’ as Ideology; or, What Does It Mean to Aestheticize Politics?,” Cultural Critique, Vol. 21, 1992.

Jünger, Ernst, Copse 125: A Chronicle from the Trench Warfare of 1918, trans. B. Creighton, London, Chatto & Windus, 1930.

Jünger, Ernst, Der Arbeiter: Herrschaft und Gestalt, Hamburg, Hanseatische Verlagsanstalt, 1932.

Jünger, Ernst, “Die Totale Mobilmachung,” in Sämtliche Werke – Band 7, Essays I: Betrachtungen zur Zeit, Stuttgart, Klett-Cotta, 1980.

Jünger, Ernst, “Technology and the Gestalt of the Worker,” in C. Mitcham and R. Mackey (eds.), Philosophy and Technology: Readings in the Philosophical Problems of Technology, New York, Free Press, 1983.

Jünger, Ernst, “Typus, Name, Gestalt,” in Sämtliche Werke – Band 15, Essays VII: Fassungen II, Stuttgart, Klett-Cotta.

Krois, John M., “The Age of Complete Mechanization,” in A. S. Hoel & I. Folkvord (eds.), Ernst Cassirer on Form and Technology: Contemporary Readings, London, Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.

Latour, Bruno, “A Cautious Prometheus? A Few Steps Toward a Philosophy of Design with Special Attention to Peter Sloterdijk,” in W. Schinkel & L. Noordegraaf-Eelens (eds.), In Medias Res: Peter Sloterdijk’s Spherological Poetics of Being, Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press, 2011.

Latour, Bruno, “Love Your Monsters: Why We Must Care for Our Technologies as We Do Our Children,” in M. Schellenberger & T. Nordhaus (eds.), Love Your Monsters: Postenvironmentalism and the Anthropocene, Oakland, The Breakthrough Institute, 2011.

Löffler, Thomas, “Ernst Jüngers organologische Verwindung der Technik auf dem Hintergrund der Biotheorie seines akademischen Lehrers Hans Driesch,” in F. Strack (ed.), Titan Technik: Ernst und Friedrich Georg Jünger über das technische Zeitalter, Würzburg, Königshausen & Neumann, 2000.

Malm, Andreas, “Against Hybridism: Why We Need to Distinguish Between Nature and Society, Now More Than Ever,” Historical Materialism, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2019.

Malm, Andreas & Hornborg, Alf, “The Geology of Mankind? A Critique of the Anthropocene Narrative,” The Anthropocene Review, Vol. 2, 2014.

Mitcham, Carl, Thinking Through Technology: The Path between Engineering and Philosophy, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1994.

Neyrat, Frédéric, The Unconstructable Earth: An Ecology of Separation, trans. D. S. Burke, New York, Fordham University, 2019.

Nietzsche, Friedrich, The Will to Power, ed. and trans. W. Kaufmann and R. J. Hollingdale. New York, Vintage Books, 1968.

Pekar, Thomas, “‘Organische Konstruktion’: Ernst Jüngers Idee einer Symbiose von Mensch und Maschine,” in F. Strack (ed.), Titan Technik: Ernst und Friedrich Georg Jünger über das technische Zeitalter, Würzburg, Königshausen & Neumann, 2000.

Pellizzoni, Luigi, Ontological Politics in a Disposable World: The New Mastery of Nature, London, Routledge, 2015.

Pellizzoni, Luigi, “New Materialism and Runaway Capitalism: A Critical Assessment,” Soft Power, Vol. 4, 2017.

Schellnhuber, Hans J., and Kropp, Jürgen, “Geocybernetics: Controlling a Complex Dynamical System Under Uncertainty,” Naturwissenschaften, Vol. 85, 1998.

Shapiro, Gary, Nietzsche’s Earth: Great Events, Great Politics, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2016.

Sloterdijk, Peter, Infinite Mobilization, trans. S. Berjan, Cambridge, Polity, 2020.

Smail, Daniel L., On Deep History and the Brain, Berkeley, University of California Press, 2008.

Spengler, Oswald, Man and Technics: A Contribution to a Philosophy of Life, trans. C. F. Atkinson, Westport, Greenwood Press, 1976.

Stiegler, Bernard, The Neganthropocene, ed. and trans. D. Ross, London, Open Humanities Press, 2018.

Stjernfelt, Frederik, “The Struggle of Titans – Ernst Jünger and Ernst Cassirer: Vitalist and Enlightenment Philosophies of Technology in Weimar Germany,” in A. S. Hoel and I. Folkvord (eds.), Ernst Cassirer on Form and Technology: Contemporary Readings, London, Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.

Sörlin, Sverker & Wormbs, Nina, “Environing Technologies: A Theory of Making Environment,” History and Technology, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2018.

Turnbull, Neil, “Heidegger and Jünger on the ‘Significance of the Century’: Technology as a Theme in Conservative Thought,” Writing Technologies, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2009.

Turnbull, Neil, “Modern Technology within the Western Theological Imaginary,” Im@go – A Journal of the Social Imaginary, Vol. 6, 2015.

Vogel, Steven, Thinking Like a Mall: Environmental Philosophy After the End of Nature, Cambridge, MIT Press, 2015.

Wilkerson, Dale A., “The Root of Heidegger’s Concern for the Earth at the Consummation of Metaphysics: The Nietzsche Lectures,” Cosmos & History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2005.

Winner, Langdon, “Rebranding the Anthropocene: A Rectification of Names,” Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, Vol. 21, No. 2-3, 2017.

Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, Mark, Steffen, Will & Crutzen, Paul J., “The New World of the Anthropocene,” Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 44, 2010.

Zimmerman, Michael E., Heidegger’s Confrontation with Modernity: Technology, Politics, and Art, Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1990.

Zwier, Jochem & Blok, Vincent, “Saving Earth: Encountering Heidegger’s Philosophy of Technology in the Anthropocene,” Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, Vol. 21, No. 2-3, 2017.

Zwier, Jochem & Blok, Vincent, “Seeing Through the Fumes: Technology and Assymetry in the Anthropocene,” Human Studies, Vol. 42, 2019.

Downloads

Published

30-12-2021

How to Cite

Andersson, D. (2021). Aesthetic Ideology in the Anthropocene: On the Total Mobilization of the Earth into the Status of a Work of Art. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 17(3), 113–144. Retrieved from https://www.cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/978